Are they Worth It? Arguments against Organic Foods
September 25, 2015
Add Comment
On any day at the supermarket, consumers have the option of
buying foods from conventional produce farms that use chemical pesticides and
herbicides or organic foods grown on farms that use only natural products to keep
pests and weeds away from the produce.
Organic foods are clearly more expensive and some consumers wonder if
the extra expense is worth it.
While foods not grown using organic techniques definitely
will contain residues of one or more types of pesticides, one study done in
2002 revealed that organic produce routinely contain pesticide residue as well,
but only one-third as much as conventional produce. Even so, the potential for ingesting
pesticides from organic foods still exists so this type of food needs to be
washed just like other produce.
Unfortunately, no standards exist as to how much pesticide consumption is
tolerable.
Another important point that detractors of organic produce
make is the finding that up to half of all “natural chemicals” used in food
production have been found to be cancer-causing when tested in a laboratory. Chemists debate whether any chemicals put on
foods is safe and there are those who doubt that any chemical food residue truly
has the ability to cause cancer regardless
of whether they are organic or conventionally-grown.
There are those who are actively looking at organic foods
and their ability to sustain the population of the earth. Some of these researchers feel that organic
agriculture alone is incapable of keeping up with the world’s food
demands. In addition, some
agriculturists feel that the soil benefits found in organic farming is solely
due to good crop rotation and has little to do with the actual organic
techniques.
Organic farmers have a greater time keeping their crops free
of mold, pests and other diseases, resulting in a lesser quality of produce and
in greater crop losses by the end of the growing season. One researcher claimed that growing only organic
tomatoes, for example, would consume more than 600 percent more land than
tomatoes grown using conventional methods.
Most people believe that organic produce is completely free
of pesticides and that no pesticides are used in the growing of organic
crops. This is, in fact, not true. Organic farmers aim to use as little
pesticides as possible but such chemicals are still used to some extent. In addition, some organic pesticides contain
an excess of copper a heavy metal. Copper leaches into the soil, builds up and
can cause health problems just like other pesticides.
Other pesticides approved for use in organic farming have
some toxicity as well. The pesticide known as sabadilla has been shown to be
toxic to honeybees and is being studied as a potentially toxic substance in
larger animals and humans.
Interestingly, while organic pesticides must be extensively
tested before they are allowed to be used to grow produce, “organic pesticides”
do not have the same requirements and may be as toxic as their conventional
counterparts.
Organic foods are more expensive to grow and are thus more
expensive to purchase than regular foods.
This means that organic foods are less available to individuals living
at lower income levels. The cost
difference for organic foods is approximately ten to forty percent higher in
average cost when compared to olrganic foods.
Every family has to make its own decision as to whether or
not to go “organic” and buy only organically grown foods. Some experts feel it is worth the extra cost
to consumers to buy organic foods, while others question the actual benefit of
buying them.
0 Response to "Are they Worth It? Arguments against Organic Foods"
Post a Comment